Skip to main content

The Causes of Israel and Hamas


The Causes of Israel VS Hamas

By: Abhijay Bhosale

The Israel-Hamas conflict is a long-standing and deeply rooted geopolitical issue that has garnered global attention for decades. This paper aims to explore the multifaceted causes that have contributed to the protracted conflict between the State of Israel and the Palestinian militant group, Hamas. By delving into historical, political, and socio-economic factors, this paper seeks to provide a comprehensive understanding of the complex dynamics that have fueled tensions in the region.  

Britain

The story starts in World War 1. In the aftermath of the war, to keep peace, the League of Nations was formed. One of the problems was what to do with the Jews. They gave Britain the job to administer Palestine. This period saw the challenges of managing the tensions between the Jewish and Arab people, a task that became greater as Jewish immigration to Palestine surged. The Balfour Declaration of 1917, expressing support for a "national home for the Jewish people" in Palestine, set the stage for the intricate relationships that followed. After World War II, there was a turning point. Britain was drowned with heightened tensions. Jewish immigration increased because of anti-semitism in Nazi and former Nazi countries and there was an ever changing political landscape in Palestine. The struggle to maintain control ultimately led to the end of the British Mandate in 1948, leaving a lasting effect on the history of the region. Following the declaration of independence by the State of Israel in 1948, Britain, alongside the United States and the Soviet Union, the 2 global superpowers that rules the period after WW2, officially recognized country as being its own. This recognition set the stage again for a new chapter in the Middle East's geopolitical landscape. In the post-independence era, Britain has maintained diplomatic ties with Israel, helping Israel through the complexities of the region's political landscape. Engaging with both Israel and the Palestinian Authority, Britain has sought to contribute to diplomatic efforts aimed at fostering peace. The enduring commitment to a two-state solution underscores Britain's ongoing role in the quest for regional stability. As we reflect on Britain's historical role in the Israel-Hamas conflict, it becomes evident that the intricate tapestry of the region is woven with threads of diplomatic challenges, historical legacies, and the pursuit of peace. Britain's engagement continues to evolve, influenced by the ever-changing dynamics of this complex narrative. In the pursuit of a comprehensive understanding, we must remain attuned to the nuances and shifts in the ongoing story of the Israel-Hamas conflict.


Independent Israel

The historical backdrop of the Israel-Hamas conflict includes the Zionist movement's aspirations for a Jewish homeland in Palestine and the subsequent establishment of the State of Israel. The displacement of Palestinian Arabs during the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, known as the Nakba, laid the foundation for deep-seated grievances and fueled Palestinian resistance movements. The Six-Day War in 1967 further intensified tensions as Israel gained control over the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip. The conflict is intricately tied to political disputes over territory, borders, and the status of Jerusalem. The failure to reach a comprehensive peace agreement, despite multiple attempts and international interventions, has perpetuated a cycle of violence and animosity. The issue of settlements in the West Bank, considered illegal under international law, remains a contentious point of contention between Israel and the Palestinians. The socio-economic dimensions of the conflict contribute to its complexity. The Gaza Strip, under the control of Hamas since 2007, faces economic hardships, high unemployment rates, and limited access to basic services. These conditions have fueled frustration and desperation among the Palestinian population, contributing to the perpetuation of conflict. Religious factors also play a significant role in the Israel-Hamas conflict. The contestation over holy sites, particularly in Jerusalem, has deep religious significance for both Jews and Muslims. Competing claims and the symbolism attached to these sites amplify tensions and contribute to the intractable nature of the conflict. The involvement of regional and global actors further complicates the Israel-Hamas conflict. Support from various countries, coupled with geopolitical interests, has influenced the dynamics of the conflict. The United States, for example, has historically supported Israel, while other nations advocate for the rights of the Palestinian people. The Israel-Hamas conflict is a deeply rooted and multifaceted issue that defies easy solutions. A comprehensive understanding of the historical, political, socio-economic, religious, and international factors at play is essential for developing effective strategies to address the root causes and promote a lasting resolution. It is imperative for the international community to continue its efforts to facilitate dialogue, promote understanding, and work towards a just and lasting peace in the region.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Story Of BlackRock: The Company That Has Joint-Ownership of the World

    The Story of BlackRock By: Abhijay Bhosale Very few people know about BlackRock. In simple terms, it's an investment management company. It exists to make money. And guess what? They're the biggest one out there. Well, how big? 10. Trillion. Dollars. They have over 10 trillion dollars (that's $10,000,000,000,000) in assets in a a wide variety of fields. The whole ordeal can be narrowed down to three things. The Mastermind, The Masterplan, and The Master's Servant. The Mastermind: Larry Fink Larry Fink is the man behind all of this. Though he owns BlackRock with 6 other people, he definitely is the face of BlackRock and defaulted to as the CEO. Born in 1952, he grew up in a rather insignificant town called Van Nuys in California. Although his family wasn't explicitly said to be poor, his family's income came from a shoe shop Fink's dad owned. After pursuing a Bachelor's Degree in political Science at University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), he de...

Why The UN Can't Get Anything Done

  Why The UN Can't Get Anything Done By: Abhijay Bhosale The UN rose out of the ashes of the League of Nations, an organization meant to do what the UN does today. After World War I, nations, many still dealing with the atrocities of the Great War, came together and joined this association. At their height, the League of Nations had 58 member countries with 8 of them being a part of a council. The League of Nations failed because of a lack of structure. Its founding principles were based on a world where everyone would agree to resolve a conflict. It assumed that the world was a utopia where every country’s first thought would be to it out rather than fight. In their defense, WW1 was still fresh in their mind. Anyway, of course, the LofN had measures to ensure these countries wouldn’t fight. They made bold proclamations and said many things. They said how they would sanction the member nations who broke their rules, how they would isolate them, and how their membership would be rev...